We audit and harden software built with Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, Lovable, Bolt, and v0 — so what works in demo also holds up under real users, real revenue, and real attackers. Then we stay on as a checkpoint while you keep shipping with AI.
AI coding tools have made it possible to ship working software in weeks instead of years. That's transformative — and it's also producing a wave of applications that workbut aren't safe to scale. These aren't theoretical. They're what we find on nearly every codebase we audit.
You built a working product with Claude Code, Cursor, or similar. You're about to onboard your first paying customers — often high-ticket B2B clients. You know enough to be worried, but you can't audit yourself.
Pre-launch audit + hardening sprint
You have customers, possibly revenue, possibly investor pressure. You built fast with AI assistance and now you're feeling the weight of technical debt. You need to demonstrate security posture to customers, partners, or due diligence.
Audit + hardening + ongoing engagement
Non-software businesses that built internal tools with AI assistance. You may handle customer data, payment info, or regulated information. You don't have an in-house engineering function.
Audit + ongoing engagement
Where most engagements start
A combined automated and manual review of your codebase and infrastructure, delivered as a written report with findings categorized by severity and a recommended roadmap for fixes.
Included
Hourly
Senior-engineer-led implementation of the fixes identified in the audit. Billed hourly with estimated scope per finding. You choose which findings to address and in what order.
Tier 1 Engagement
Lightweight, automated-first ongoing security oversight. Automated scanning on every push, monthly dependency and CVE review, Slack channel / email contact for ongoing questions, quarterly review call.
Tier 2 Engagement
Senior-engineer review and partnership for teams actively shipping. Everything in Anchor, plus PR review on the changes that matter most — auth, payments, data access, infrastructure — monthly working sessions, and included hardening hours.
Traditional security firms run vulnerability scanners and OWASP checklists. We use Claude Code, Cursor, and Copilot in our own work — and we read your code the way an experienced engineer reviews a junior's PR. We know the shortcuts, hallucinated APIs, and copy-paste patterns these tools produce.
Some engagements aren't worth doing — wrong stack, a mature security function already in place, a codebase that doesn't have the failure modes we work on. We say so on the discovery call rather than sell you something that won't help.
The engineer on your discovery call is the engineer reviewing your code. Engagements run end-to-end with the same experienced people — no handoff to junior staff after the contract is signed.
Audit deliverables are written for the person who'll act on them — findings ranked by real risk, with plain-language context on each. Not a 200-page PDF of CVE numbers nobody on your team will open.
The stacks we know best. We bring in network expertise when an engagement calls for something adjacent.
Free, 30 minutes. We learn about your project, your stack, and what you're trying to accomplish. You learn whether we're the right fit.
If there's mutual fit, we send a brief scoping document with proposed engagement terms and pricing.
Signed agreement, read-only access to the codebase, and a kickoff call.
Audit report delivered, followed by a walkthrough call.
You choose what comes next: hardening, an Anchor or Backbone engagement, both, or neither. No pressure either way.
Free, 30 minutes. Tell us about what you've built, your stack, and what you're trying to ship. If we're a fit, we'll send a scoping document next. If we're not, we'll say so.